Skip to content

Trying to Solve the Travel Puzzle

May 2, 2010

Like most addictions, a travel addiction can be time-consuming.  Where should I go next?  What is the best plan of attack?  How many places can I squeeze in and still get to see and do everything I want?  How far will my money stretch?  I recently decided I want to take a Spanish class in another country and live with a family for a week.  A sort of mini study abroad.  I loved Spain, where I went for study abroad in college, but I want to explore a country I haven’t been to yet.  So I started looking into Ecuador and Peru.  They’re both known for having good language schools, they’re inexpensive, beautiful countries, and they both have lots to see and do.  I keep going back and forth on which is the better option for various reasons, but mostly based on whether I think I’ll have enough time to see Machu Picchu if I pick Peru.  On paper it looks like I have enough time, but I have to take into consideration the strong possibility of altitude sickness.  Since I will need to take things slowly to avoid or get over altitude sickness, I probably don’t have enough time to go to Machu Picchu before starting a class in Cusco, Peru.  So for today anyway, I’m leaning towards Quito, Ecuador.

While trying to make that decision, I’m also trying to strategically plan out my remaining vacation days.  I have 6 days to play with, so I’m planning on taking the Spanish class the week of Labor Day, that way I can save one vacation day.  But I also want to take a trip to Europe at Thanksgiving.  The long holiday weekend is just too tempting, it’s like free time, and it would be even better if I could tack on a vacation day or two.  My top choice for the Thanksgiving trip is Prague, and if I have time for another destination, that would be great, but I haven’t worked it all out yet.  I’m actually trying to plan this trip based on where I can get a direct flight since that means more time spent in Europe.  If I fly to Prague first, which is not a direct flight, I won’t get there until late in the afternoon.  If I fly to London first (to go to Stonehenge) I’ll get there first thing in the morning.  This also means more bouncing around during an already short trip.

I will admit, I’m a bit of a list-ticker, which is why I’m even considering doing Stonehenge and Prague in one trip over Thanksgiving break.  I love crossing off a new country, new city, new continent.  I even have a big map on my wall with hundreds of color-coded pins to show where I’ve been, where I want to go, trips that are already planned, etc.  My friend Amanda also introduced me to the Hillman Wonders of the World and we have sort of a competition going to cross off the gold medals, which are the places on his top 100 list.  So far I’ve been to 24, in case you’re curious.  While there are many places I want to go to that aren’t on the top 100, most of my travel planning does involve this list.  As a result, I am constantly trying to figure out the best way to plan a trip based on crossing off gold medals winners and getting to new countries while still making sure I’m going to places I truly care about seeing.  This is why trying to plan two trips with 6 vacation days and a few holidays can be even more frustrating, because I’m trying to maximize my time while still being able to enjoy my surroundings.  It really feels like trying to fit pieces of a puzzle together, except that there are multiple ways to solve this particular puzzle.  I just don’t know which way looks best yet, but maybe part of the fun for me is in the possibilities.

This is the map hanging on my wall, although you can't see the different colored pins too well.

4 Comments leave one →
  1. Jill Starnes permalink
    May 4, 2010 10:16 AM

    Wow!!! Your blog rocks. You are an awesome travel writer. If you ever need a travel buddy, just let me know.

  2. War Eagle permalink
    May 6, 2010 2:49 PM

    You only need a day to adjust to altitude. All though with your screwed up nose it may take you a little longer. I have never had a problem with it in Colorado when I ski. They say you should wait a full 24 hours before doing anything strenuous, but many times I have gotten out there late afternoon and gone sking the next morning with no problems. I am not sure how high Machu Picchu is, but if you are are only going to be up about 7-9K feet for a few hours you should be ok. You may get a headache and at the worst you might feel a little sick. I know some of the peaks around that area of the world reach 13-15K, but you probably won’t be going to the summit. Also remeber that an airplane is pressurised to about 7K feet and you will be on that for a couple of hours so that will help with the transition.

    • May 6, 2010 5:59 PM

      I’d have to fly from Lima to Cusco & the flight is only about an hour or so. Cusco is over 11,000 feet. Machi Picchu is about 8,000. I just don’t want to rush myself & take the chance that I’ll get sick or have a horrible headache while trying to experience this wonderful place, you know? Plus there are lots of other places in Peru I want to see so I think I’m going to wait until I have time to do Machu Picchu & some other places all in one trip. I’m about ready to commit to the class in Ecuador instead 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: